Youโve finessed your copy so itโs on brief and on message. Itโs got an ideal readability score. Hemingway and gov.uk would be proud.
And then the client comes back.
They love the structure and the clear messaging. Youโve written some great lines. But it needs โbolstering.โ What will make it perfect, the client says, will be to sprinkle some revolutionary, market-leading innovation to reflect that theyโre at the cutting edge and redefining the industry.
They want hollow words, bland fluff, meaningless puffspeak (although theyโre not thinking of it in those terms).
This happens quite a bit in B2B (although B2C and non-profit have their own variations on the theme).
How can you steer clients away from the dark side of hyperbole?
Now, the client is ultimately the decision maker since theyโre paying the bill. But as the copywriter, there are respectful ways to challenge this feedback before you go ahead and weaken your copy.
Based on my experiences as an agency copywriter and a freelancer, here are my top 5 strategies for discussing fluff requests with clients.
1.ย Ask why they want to add the bland fluff words
Usually itโs because they want to sound impressive, in order to establish authority and build trust.
Frame the discussion that way, and you can focus the conversation on the basis for that authority.
What makes them revolutionary, market leading and cutting edge?
Theyโre revolutionary because they have more patents than their competitors. Customers are 150% more productive since they started using the product/service. Theyโve been growing their R&D tax credits year on year.
Then you can strengthen the copy by showing instead of weakening it by telling.
When you drill into specifics and get the juicy stories and facts, there are 2 benefits:
- You address the clientโs feedback effectively, so theyโre happy
- You make the copy more compelling, so the clientโs happy and youโre happy.
2. Ask how they speak about the company/product/service
In an ideal world, this is part of your briefing process. Hopefully youโve gotten to go beyond the brand guidelines and boilerplate and speak to actual salespeople or spokespeople. But itโs not always possible, which is why this approach is useful.
Good salespeople rarely crowd their pitches with fluff. You get the odd word in, but thereโs context and it sounds natural.
Even getting the client to say the fluffed-up copy out loud can make a difference, because they realise they donโt actually speak the way they wantย you to write.
3. Refer to testimonials
โThis technology revolutionises operationsโ has little impact.
โJohn Smith, Operations Director at ABC Ltd, said, โThe solution has revolutionised our operationsโโ does.
Are there customer stories that use the language the client is asking you to include? If so, quote them.
Important note: You should also refer to customer stories to suggest better ways of communicating the message about being cutting edge and market leading. I flag it if customers arenโt using the words the client is suggesting. Given that youโre aiming to continue the conversation in the readerโs head, you need to speak the audienceโs language โ and flagging this is powerful ammunition.
4. Ask for a second opinion
I often use this approach when I have an established relationship and rapport with a client.
You may not have contact with other people in the organisation, and the copy may have already done the rounds internally before you received the feedback.
But if you know thereโs a good sales guy, subject matter expert or friendly customer, ask if they can read both versions.
I usually say something like, โBefore we go ahead with these changes, can we just check in with Jane first? She had a useful perspective on a previous project, and I want to make sure we keep the copy focused on what resonates with the customer.โ
5. Test both versions
I debated putting testing higher up the list, but in my experience this depends a lot on the client and the project. Some clients donโt like to test, and some projects donโt lend themselves to short-term results (like a corporate brochure, for example). But if it relates to online copy or email, testing is usually very easy.
If you feel the amends will jeopardise the copyโs effectiveness, test to prove it. Itโs not about digging your heels in, itโs about saying that customers are the best judges of what works.
This is liberating because the data takes the subjectivity out.
Finally, know when to let go
To paraphrase William Faulkner, part of writing is knowing when to kill your darlings. And the sentiment applies to this situation as well.
Copywriting is a craft, and as a copywriter youโre delivering a service fortified with skill and strategy. But you also need to have perspective.
Ultimately, itโs the clientโs copy and the clientโs money โ and as long as youโre comfortable youโve voiced your expert opinion respectfully, put the client at the cutting edge and move on to next project on your to-do list.
What’s your experience? Are there other strategies that work well for you?
Connect with me over at Gunning Marketing, on Twitterย and on LinkedIn.

Comments
13th May 2016
John Espirian
Nice work, Anna. Points 1 and 2 are particularly useful. Perhaps it’s just me, but none of my clients ever want to try point 5 (A/B testing) โ a shame, I think.
13th May 2016
Anna Gunning
Thanks, John! I know what you mean about testing – I find it varies loads across my clients. And I was actually astounded to learn that one big email service (I won’t name and shame) didn’t allow for subject line split tests on a paid version. And that’s pretty basic…